|
|
|
|
- Minnesota -
Underage Drinking: Internal Possession by Minors
|
Internal possession is not explicitly prohibited. Notes: INTERNAL POSSESSION: Although Minnesota does not prohibit Internal Possession as defined by APIS, it has a statutory provision that makes it unlawful "[f]or any person under the age of 21 years to consume any alcoholic beverages" and further defines "consume" to " [include] the ingestion of an alcoholic beverage and the physical condition of having ingested an alcoholic beverage." Minn. Stat. § 340A.503. Laws that prohibit minors from having alcohol in their bodies, but which do so without reference to a blood, breath, or urine test, are not considered as prohibiting Internal Possession as defined by APIS.
|
Explanatory Notes and Limitations
Comparison Map
Legal Citations
|
Underage Drinking: Minimum Ages for On-Premises Servers and Bartenders
|
Beer:
18 for both servers and bartenders
Wine:
18 for both servers and bartenders
Spirits:
18 for both servers and bartenders
Notes: Prior to July 1, 2007, minors who had reached the age of 17 could be employed to provide waiter or waitress service in rooms or areas where the presence of 3.2 percent “malt liquor” was incidental to food service or preparation. Minnesota defines “3.2 percent malt liquor” as any beer, ale, or other malt beverage containing not more than 3.2 percent alcohol by weight. Beginning on July 1, 2007, minors who have reached the age of 16 may be so employed.
|
Explanatory Notes and Limitations
Comparison Map
Legal Citations
|
Underage Drinking: False Identification for Obtaining Alcohol
|
Provision(s) targeting minors:
- Use of a false ID to obtain alcohol is a criminal offense
- Penalty may include driver's license suspension through a judicial procedure
Provision(s) targeting suppliers:
- It is a criminal offense to lend, transfer, or sell a false ID
Provision(s) targeting retailers:
- Licenses for drivers under age 21 are easily distinguishable from those for drivers age 21 and older
- Retailers are permitted to seize apparently false IDs
- Specific affirmative defense - the retailer inspected the false ID and came to a reasonable conclusion based on its appearance that it was valid
|
Explanatory Notes and Limitations
Comparison Map
Legal Citations
|
|